108-16606-002 Agenda Item No. 3 ( a & b )
September 6, 2006 Meeting of October 3, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Agency Commissioners
FROM: Marcia Rosen, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Authorizing an Owner Participation Agreement with Alfred McAfee, for the proposed development located at 4132 Third Street, at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue (Assessor’s Block 5260, Lots 002 and 003); Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area.
Conditionally approving a schematic design for the proposed development located at 4132 Third Street at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue (Assessor’s Block 5260, Lots 002 and 003); Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the request of Agency staff, through the Executive Director, the Commission unanimously voted at its September 19, 2006 meeting to continue this proposed Owner Participation Agreement (“OPA”) and its schematic design approval to the next Redevelopment Agency Commission meeting on October 3, 2006.
The 4132 Third Street property, containing approximately 5,465 square feet of land, is located at the northeast corner of Third Street and Innes Avenue in the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area (“Project Area”). The property is comprised of two legal, assessor’s lots and is currently unimproved. Alfred McAfee (“Owner”) has submitted an application for a lot line adjustment through the City’s Department of Public Works / Bureau of Street Use & Mapping (“DPW/BSM”) to merge these two existing lots into one developable parcel (the “Site”). Thereafter, the Owner proposes to construct on the Site a condominium development consisting of a four-story wood-frame mixed-use building, containing seven, three-story townhouses over a ground floor garage area along side a commercial unit (the “Development”).
The Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Plan (the “Plan”) designates this Site as light industrial or commercial, with residential uses allowed above ground floor commercial uses. The Owner is seeking approval of an OPA to construct a new, four-story mixed-use building containing a total area of approximately 14,755 square feet. The ground floor will be occupied by approximately 1,837 square feet of commercial space, approximately 2,603 square feet of garage area with parking for seven cars (including one accessible space) and two bicycle spaces, and also lobby areas (with an elevator access) which shall provide access to the residential units above. The residential units shall consist of seven, three-story townhouses, with designated open spaces for all units as required under the Plan, and which all are accessed from the podium level.
Six of the residential units will be sold as condominiums at market rate prices. And, although this Development is not subject to the affordable housing objectives of the Agency’s Housing Participation Policy (“AHPP”), the Owner has volunteered to designate one of the seven units as an affordable housing unit. This unit will be subject to the affordability standards of the AHPP; however, the marketing obligations will be reduced in consideration of the small size of this project. The Owner plans to retain the retail / commercial space on the ground floor. The Development will also include the rebuilding of the surrounding sidewalks and the planting of street trees adjacent to the streets fronting the Development. The Owner is not seeking any Agency financial assistance or any variances to zoning that would benefit his development. Also, the Developer has voluntarily agreed to participate in the Agency's small business enterprise, construction workforce, and prevailing wage programs.
The Owner is also seeking approval of a proposed schematic design for the proposed Development. Staff has reviewed the schematic design for the proposed Development and finds it acceptable subject to the conditions of approval described below. Staff has determined that, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15332, the Development is categorically exempt from CEQA review as an infill development that will not result in significant environmental impacts or expansion of utilities to service the project.
The Owner presented the proposed Development at numerous subcommittees of the Bayview Hunters Point Project Area Committee (“PAC”) in February and March of 2006, and the Development was endorsed by the full PAC on March 16, 2006.
Staff recommends the approval of the Owner Participation Agreement, and conditional approval of the schematic design.
DISCUSSION
Project Summary
■ The Development ‒ The Site is approximately 5,465 square feet of unimproved land area that consists of two adjacent assessor’s lots (Lots 002 and 003 of Assessor’s Block 5260). The Owner is currently processing a Lot Line Adjustment application through the City’s Department of Public Works / Bureau of Streets Use & Mapping, to merge these two lots into one developable parcel. The Owner proposes to construct a new, four-story mixed-use building of approximately 14,755 square feet. The ground floor will be occupied by approximately 1,837 square feet of commercial space, approximately 2,683 square feet of residential garage area with parking for seven cars (including one accessible space) and two bicycle spaces, and also lobby areas (with an elevator access) which shall provide access to all of the residential units above. The residential units shall consist of seven, three-story townhouses, with designated private, open spaces for all units as required under the Plan, all of which all are accessed from the podium level. Six of the residential townhouse units will be sold as condominiums at market rate prices and one townhouse will be designated as an affordable housing unit, at the request of the Owner. This unit will be subject to the affordability standards of the AHPP; however, the marketing obligations will be reduced in consideration of the small size of this project. Four of the units will average 1,510 square feet in floor area, and will have three bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms (with each having its own private open space averaging 223 square feet). The other three townhouses will average approximately 1,398 square feet in floor area, and each will have two bedrooms and two bathrooms (with each having its own private open space of approximately 67 square feet). The Owner will retain the retail / commercial space on the ground floor. The Development will also include the rebuilding of the surrounding sidewalks and the planting of street trees on those portions of Innes Avenue and Third Street which front the Development.
■ Permitted Land Use and Plan Compliance ‒ The Plan designates this site as light industrial or commercial, with residential uses allowed above ground floor commercial uses. The Bayview Industrial Triangle Design for Development (the “Design for Development”) permits a maximum floor area ratio of 4:1, which allows for a building with a density of 30,000 square feet and a maximum height of 65 feet. The proposed Development meets the density and height requirements and includes the minimum number of off-street residential parking spaces and bicycle spaces. Due to the small amount of floor area in the commercial unit, the Plan does not require any commercial parking spaces in this proposed Development.
■ Schematic Design ‒ The Owner’s architect has submitted schematic design drawings of the Development; however, more detailed drawings need to be developed and submitted that indicate the specific detailed design of the elements for the facade, including the balconies and the proposed exterior lighting in front of the building and in the open space areas, together with the articulation of proposed materials. The architect must also: (1) provide detailed drawings of the exterior graphics with glass mosaic tiles; and (2) show that all projections over the sidewalk have met applicable City Code requirements. Also, detailed landscape drawings for all private and common open space areas, together with actual samples of all proposed exterior materials and colors, must be submitted for the Agency’s review and approval. Additionally, all exterior signs for the commercial space need to be pre-approved by Agency prior to filing for a permit with the City’s Department of Building Inspection.
■ Environmental Review ‒Agency staff has determined that the proposed Development is categorically exempt from CEQA environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, “Infill Development.” The proposed Development is characterized as an in-fill development meeting the following conditions: (1) the proposed Development is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies and zoning designations and regulations; (2) the proposed Development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (3) the Site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (4) approval of the proposed Development would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and (5) the Development can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
■ Community Input ‒While no formal community advisory body exists for the Bayview Industrial Triangle, the Agency consults with the PAC, as appropriate, on matters related to the Bayview Industrial Triangle Project Area. The Owner presented the proposed Development at the PAC subcommittee meetings in February and March of 2006. The full PAC unanimously endorsed the proposed Development on March 16, 2006.
Proposed OPA Terms and Condition
The following briefly outlines key provisions of the proposed OPA:
■ Applicability of the Agency’s Housing Participation Policy (“AHPP”) ‒ While this Development is not subject to the AHPP, the Owner has voluntarily offered to designate one of the two-bedroom townhouse units as affordable. Therefore in accordance with the AHPP, one of these units will be available to households earning up to 100% of area median income (currently $72,950 for two persons). The affordable unit will be offered through an outreach and lottery system pursuant to comparable procedures established in the AHPP, with Agency certificate holders receiving first preference.
■ Small Business Enterprise ("SBE") Program, Construction Workforce Program and Prevailing Wage Provisions – The Developer has voluntarily agreed to comply with the Agency's Small Business Enterprise Program and will make good-faith efforts to achieve the goals of the Agency's SBE Program. In addition, the Developer has voluntarily agreed to comply with the Agency's construction workforce program and the Agency’s prevailing wage provisions for all construction work done in conjunction with the project.
■ Lot Line Adjustment The Owner is currently processing a Lot Line Adjustment application through the City’s Department of Public Works / Bureau of Streets Use & Mapping (“DPW/BSM”), to merge these two lots into one developable parcel. The proposed OPA is conditioned upon the lot line adjustment being approved. Even though the proposed OPA may be approved by the Redevelopment Commission, it will not be recorded until after the lot line adjustment has been approved and recorded by DPW/BSM.
■ Schedule of Performance – Although the Developer expects to commence construction in early 2007 with completion in fall 2008, the OPA provides for the following key outside performance dates:
|
Submission – Preliminary Construction Documents |
Within 120 days of Commission approval of the OPA |
|
Submission – Final Construction Documents |
Within 120 days after Agency staff approval of the Preliminary Construction Documents |
|
Commencement of construction
|
Within 30 days after issuance of the Building Permit by the City of San Francisco |
|
Completion of construction
|
Within 18-months of issuance of the Building Permit by the City |
Originated by Albert J. Luis, Senior Development Specialist,
and Saiful Abedin, Staff Architect
Marcia Rosen
Executive Director
Attachments:
- 4132 Third Street Vicinity Maps
- 4132 Third Street Floor Plans
- 4132 Third Street Illustrative Renderings, view from Third Street and Innes Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. 124-2006
AUTHORIZING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH ALFRED MCAFEE, FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4132 THIRD STREET, AT THE INTERSECTION OF THIRD STREET AND INNES AVENUE (ASSESSOR’S BLOCK 5260, LOTS 002 AND 003); BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- Alfred McAfee (the "Owner"), owns approximately 5,465 square feet of land located at 4132 Third Street (the "Site") in the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area "). The Site is at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue.
- The Owner proposes to construct on the Site a condominium development consisting of a four-story wood-frame mixed-use building, containing seven, three-story townhouses over a ground floor garage area along side a commercial unit (the “Development”).
- The Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Plan (the “Plan”) designates the Site as light industrial or commercial, with residential uses allowed above ground floor commercial uses. The Bayview Industrial Triangle Design for Development (the “Design for Development”) imposes certain development standards on the Site.
- The proposed Development complies with the requirements of the Plan and the Design for Development.
- The Owner and Developer have agreed to comply with the Agency’s small business enterprise, construction workforce, and permanent workforce programs for the Development.
- The proposed Development is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, as an infill development that will not result in significant environmental impacts or expansion of utilities to service the project demolition of a single-family residence.
- The Plan provides for owners to participate in the redevelopment of private property in the Project Area. This Owner wishes to participate and to enter into an Owner Participation Agreement.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute an Owner Participation Agreement and related documents with Alfred McAfee for the proposed development at 4132 Third Street, located at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue (Assessor’s Block 5260, Lots 002 and 003); in the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
RESOLUTION NO. 125-2006
CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A SCHEMATIC DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4132 THIRD STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF THIRD STREET AND INNES AVENUE (ASSESSOR’S BLOCK 5260, LOTS 002 AND 003); BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- Alfred McAfee (the "Owner"), owns approximately 5,465 square feet of land located at 4132 Third Street (the "Site") in the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area. The Site is at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue.
- The Owner proposes to construct on the Site a condominium development consisting of a four-story wood-frame mixed-use building, containing seven three-story townhouses over a ground floor garage area along side a commercial unit (the “Development”).
- The Agency Commission is concurrently considering entering into an Owner Participation Agreement (“OPA”) for the Development.
- The proposed Development complies with the requirements of the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan").
- Alan Martinez, the architect, will develop the Schematic Design for the Site.
- The Plan provides for residential and commercial space uses on the Site. The Schematic Design for the proposed Development meets the density and height requirements and includes seven off-street parking spaces.
- Staff recommends approval of the Schematic Design, subject to Agency Commission approval of the OPA and satisfactory resolution of the following design concerns which staff believes can be addressed during the next design phase:
- More detailed drawings need to be developed indicating the specific detailed design for elements including balconies, proposed exterior lighting in front of the building and in open space areas, and articulation of proposed materials.
- Provide detailed drawings of the exterior graphics with glass mosaic tiles.
- All projections over the sidewalk need to meet applicable City Code requirements.
- Detailed landscape drawings for all private and common open space areas must be submitted for the Agency’s review and approval.
- Samples of all proposed exterior materials and colors must be submitted for the Agency’s review and approval.
- All exterior signs for the commercial spaces need to be pre-approved by the Agency prior to filing for a permit with the Department of Building Inspection.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute an Owner Participation Agreement and related documents with Alfred McAfee for the proposed development at 4132 Third Street, located at the intersection of Third Street and Innes Avenue (Assessor’s Block 5260, Lots 002 and 003); in the Bayview Industrial Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
September 27, 2006 Agenda Item No. 4 ( b )
101-6606-002 Meeting of October 3, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Agency Commissioners
FROM: Marcia Rosen
Executive Director
SUBJECT: Authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 790 Bargaining Unit, for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 790, represents a bargaining unit of miscellaneous, non-management employees of the Agency. The Agency first recognized Local 790 as the employee representative of this unit in 1969, when the union was known as SEIU, Local 400. In July 2003, the Agency Commission approved a three year contract with this bargaining unit for a period ending June 30, 2006. In 2004, the Agency Commission approved a first amendment to this contract. Starting in June 2006, the Agency and Local 790 negotiated new contract provisions and recently reached tentative agreements. The proposed agreements include the following new provisions: a three year term ending on June 30, 2009; salary increases that match increases for City and County of San Francisco (“City”) employees represented by Local 790; authorization for paid overtime employees to cash-out a maximum of 80 hours of compensatory time (if they have accrued any) on an annual basis; renegotiation of retirement benefits if and when City employees receive enhanced retirement benefits that the voters approve and that exceed the Agency’s retirement program; and a commitment by the Agency to review the existing status of two classifications exempt from paid overtime requirements. In other respects, the new agreement extends the terms and conditions of the existing contract.
Staff recommends approval of the Memoranda of Agreement with the bargaining unit represented by the SEIU Local 790.
DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency establishes the essential terms and conditions of employment for its workers through the Agency’s Personnel Policy, the Agency Resolution establishing classifications of positions and compensation (“Salary Resolution”), and memoranda of agreement with four bargaining units that are represented by unions. (In addition, federal and state labor laws govern personnel practices at the Agency.) Any changes to Agency policies and contracts are subject to Commission approval. Although the Personnel Policy and Salary Resolution apply to all Agency employees, the labor agreements apply only to those employees whose job classifications fall within one of the four bargaining units. The action before the Commission is the consideration of approval of the agreement that Agency staff and Local 790 has negotiated.
Of the Agency’s 107 permanent employee positions, approximately 43 (or 40 percent of the entire workforce) are members of the Local 790 Bargaining Unit. Local 790 has represented a group of miscellaneous, non-management employees of the Agency since 1969, when the union was known as SEIU, Local 400.
In 2003, the Agency entered into a three year contract with the Local 790 Unit. The parties reopened this contract in 2004 for the purpose of renegotiating salaries, which the Agency Commission approved in September 2004. In June 2006, the Agency’s negotiator and the Local 790 Unit initiated negotiations to draft a new contract. After several negotiating sessions over two months, the parties reached agreement on new terms for a memorandum of agreement (“MOA”) that the Commission is now considering. The new provisions in the MOA match the provisions in the contract covering comparable City employees represented by Local 790.[1]
The new provisions of the MOA cover the following subjects:
1. SALARIES.
Over the next three years, employees in the Local 790 Unit will receive the same salary increases as the City employees represented by Local 790, although the timing of the increases for Agency and City employees is different. Agency employees in the Local 790 Unit will receive the following increases to their base salaries: 2.5 percent on January 1, 2007; 2 percent on June 30, 2008; and 3.75 percent on January 1, 2009. (By contrast, the City’s Local 790 employees will receive 2.5 percent on December 30, 2006; 2 percent on April 5, 2008; and 3.75 percent on April 4, 2009.) In addition, the Agency proposes to continue paying the employee’s 7 percent contribution to the retirement fund, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). This is comparable to the City-Local 790 Agreement in which the City agreed to pick up the employee’s contributions to the City retirement program, which is different than the CalPERS program.
2. OVERTIME PAY.
a) Cash-out of Compensatory Time Off. Under federal and state law, employers must pay certain employees “overtime” at a rate of time and one-half for each hour in excess of eight (8) hours in any day or in excess of forty (40) hours in any week. (In general, employees who are in executive, professional, and administrative positions are exempt from these paid overtime requirements.) The Agency has several job classifications that constitute paid overtime positions (“P”classifications). All of these positions are in the Local 790 Bargaining Unit.
Under the existing Local 790 MOA, paid overtime employees may elect to receive compensatory time off (“comp time”) instead of paid overtime until the employee reaches a maximum of 120 hours of comp time. If the employee continues to accrue overtime beyond 120 hours, the Agency must pay the overtime rate for any hour in excess of 120 hours. [2] The proposed Agency-Local 790 MOA allows employees in the P classifications (who have elected to receive comp time) to cash-out, on an annual basis, their accrued compensatory time up to a maximum of 80 hours. This provision is comparable to the City-Local 790 contract, which allows a paid overtime employee to cash out accrued comp time at the end of the fiscal year.
b) Classification Review. Local 790 has requested that the Agency change two classifications, Facility Maintenance Supervisor and Property Management Specialist, from their current exempt status as paid overtime to positions requiring the Agency to pay overtime. Federal and state law govern this review, which will require an analysis of the positions’ job description and actual job functions. In a side letter to the MOA, the Agency will complete this review by December 31, 2006.
3. RETIREMENT.
As noted above, the Agency proposes to continue paying the employees’ contribution to the CalPERS retirement program. In addition, the proposed Agency-Local 790 MOA provides that if City voters approve a change to the San Francisco Charter that gives City employees additional retirement benefits exceeding the Agency’s current benefits[3], the parties will reopen the contract for the purpose of renegotiating Agency retirement benefits. Prior to the election at which City voters will consider the Charter amendment, the Agency will obtain an actuarial study from CalPERS for the purpose of determining the financial impact of changing the Agency’s retirement formula to conform to the City’s proposal. If the ballot measure passes, the Agency and Local 790 will then have the information to negotiate a possible change in retirement benefits.
CONCLUSION
The new provisions in the Agency contract with the Local 790 Unit are the product of extensive negotiations and are comparable to those in the City contract for employees represented by Local 790. Accordingly, the staff recommends approval of the Memoranda of Agreement with the Local 790 Bargaining Unit.
Originated by Jim Morales, General Counsel
Marcia Rosen
Executive Director
RESOLUTION NO. 130-2006
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
WITH THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU)
LOCAL 790 BARGAINING UNIT, FOR THE PERIOD OF
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 790, represents a bargaining unit of miscellaneous, non-management employees at the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco (“Agency”).
- By Resolution No. 128-2003, dated July 29, 2003, the Agency authorized the execution of a three-year Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with the SEIU Local 790 Bargaining Unit (“Union”). By Resolution No. 109-2004, dated September 21, 2004, the Agency approved a first amendment to the MOA. On June 30, 2006, the MOA expired, but the Agency and Union (“Parties”) agreed to abide by its terms pending the negotiation of a new contract.
- The City and County of San Francisco (“City”) recently concluded labor negotiations with its employees who are represented by Local 790: Collective Bargaining Agreement between and for Service Employees International Union, Locals UHW, 535 and 790, and the City and County of San Francisco, July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2009 (“Local 790-City Agreement”).
- The Parties relied on the Local 790-City Agreement in negotiating a new contract for Agency employees.
- The Parties have negotiated a new MOA to cover the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. The MOA includes the following new provisions: salary increases that match increases for City employees represented by Local 790; authorization for paid overtime employees to cash-out a maximum of 80 hours of compensatory time (if they have accrued any) on an annual basis; renegotiation of retirement benefits if and when City employees receive enhanced retirement benefits that San Francisco voters may approve and that exceed the Agency’s retirement program; and a commitment by the Agency to review the status of two classifications that are currently exempt from paid overtime requirements. In other respects, the new MOA does not change the terms of the previous agreement.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the SEIU Local 790 Bargaining Unit, for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
[1] The Collective Bargaining Agreement Between and for Service Employees International Union, Locals UHW, 535 and 790, and the City and County of San Francisco, July 1, 2006-June 30, 2009 (“City-Local 790 Agreement”) is available online at www.sfgov.org/site/dhr.
[2] Moreover, under the Agency’s Personnel Policy, employees who leave the Agency are entitled to receive a cash payment for any accrued comp time that does not exceed the annual 120 hour maximum and that has not been used in the calendar year.
[3] The Agency’s current retirement plan is 2 percent @ 55 years after five years of service whereas the City’s plan is 2 percent @ 60 years after ten years of service.
September 27, 2006 Agenda Item No. 4 ( c, d & e )
101-6506-002 Meeting of October 3, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Agency Commissioners
FROM: Marcia Rosen
Executive Director
SUBJECT: Authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) Local 21 Architects and Engineers unit for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009
Authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) Local 21 Professional/Technical Unit for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009
Authorizing execution of a Memorandum of Agreement with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) Local 21 Management/Supervisory Unit for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), Local 21, represents three bargaining units at the Redevelopment Agency: the Architects and Engineers Unit, Professional/Technical Unit and Management/Supervisory Unit. In September 2004, the Agency Commission approved two year contracts with these three bargaining units for a period ending June 30, 2006. Starting in May 2006, the Agency and Local 21 negotiated new contract provisions and recently reached tentative agreements. The proposed agreements include the following new provisions: a three year term ending on June 30, 2009; salary increases that match increases for City and County of San Francisco (“City”) employees represented by Local 21; an expanded salary range for Agency employees meeting special criteria that match the City-Local 21 Agreement; equity adjustments in salary for certain Agency classifications that are tied to City classifications receiving the same adjustment; a telecommuting provision that matches the City-Local 21 Agreement; and a commitment by the Agency to review two classifications in the Management /Supervisory Unit for the purpose of determining whether their comparable City classification remains valid. In other respects, the new agreements do not change the terms of the previous contracts.
Staff recommends approval of the Memoranda of Agreement with the three bargaining units represented by the IFPTE Local 21.
DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency establishes the essential terms and conditions of employment for its workers through the Agency’s Personnel Policy, the Agency Resolution establishing classifications of positions and compensation (“Salary Resolution”), and memoranda of agreement with four bargaining units that are represented by unions. (In addition, federal and state labor laws govern personnel practices at the Agency.) Any changes to Agency policies and contracts are subject to Commission approval. Although the Personnel Policy and Salary Resolution apply to all Agency employees, the labor agreements apply only to those employees whose job classifications fall within one of the four bargaining units. The action before the Commission is the consideration of approval of the three agreements that Agency executive management and Local 21 have negotiated.
Of the Agency’s 107 permanent employee positions, approximately 55 (or 52 percent of the entire workforce) are members of the three bargaining units represented by IFPTE Local 21: the Architects and Engineers Unit, Professional/Technical Unit and Management /Supervisory Unit (“Local 21 Units”). Local 21 has represented the Architects and Engineers Unit since the early 1970’s; it has represented the Professional/Technical Unit and Management /Supervisory Unit since 2004.
In 2004, the Agency entered into two year contracts with the Local 21 Units. In May 2006, the Agency’s negotiator and the Local 21 Units initiated negotiations for the purpose of drafting new contracts. After approximately thirteen negotiating sessions over three months, the parties reached agreement on new terms for the three memoranda of agreement (“MOAs”) that the Commission is now considering. With one exception, the new provisions in the three MOAs are identical and match the provisions in the contract covering comparable City employees represented by Local 21.[1] (The one exception, as described below, is the Agency’s agreement to conduct a comparability and salary study for two classifications in the Management/Supervisory Bargaining Unit.)
The new provisions of the MOAs cover the following subjects:
1. SALARIES.
a) Increases. Employees in the three Local 21 Units will receive the same salary increases over the next three years, consisting of the following: 2.5 percent on January 1, 2007; 2 percent on June 30, 2008; and 3.5 percent on January 1, 2009. These salary increases are identical to those that City employees in Local 21 bargaining units receive. [2] In addition, the Agency agreed to continue paying the employee’s 7 percent contribution to the retirement fund, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). This is comparable to the City-Local 21 Agreement in which the City agreed to increase city employees’ base wage by 7 percent in exchange for the employees’ agreement to pay the employee retirement contribution amount, which is 7.5 percent of their salary. (City workers, however, participate in different retirement system than CalPERS.)
b) Extended Range. In addition, employees in the Agency Local 21 Units will be eligible, under a new provision that is identical one in the City-Local 21 Agreement, for an additional salary increase (or placement in an “extended range”) not to exceed 7.5 percent of an employee’s base salary under one of the following special circumstances: 1) the employee is in a classification without promotional opportunities; 2) the employee exercises a special skill; 3) additional compensation recognizes exemplary performance; 4) the compensation addresses “demonstrated recruitment or retention issues;” or 5) the employee is engaged in a special project of limited duration. Placement in an “extended range” of compensation is at the discretion of the Executive Director, is subject to the availability of funds, and renders the employee ineligible for other types of salary increase, such as acting assignment pay, supervisory differentials, or performance incentive payments, if applicable.[3] The decisions of the Executive Director about placement in an extended range are not subject to a grievance or any other type of appeal.
c) Equity Adjustments. The Agency’s Salary Resolution and the Local 21 MOAs link the salaries of certain Agency classifications to comparable City classifications. In turn, other Agency positions are then tied to the Agency classifications that have an external benchmark with City classifications. For example, the salary of the Agency Architect classification is linked to the City’s Architect classification; the salary of the Agency Civil Engineer classification is linked to the City’s Civil Engineer classification. The City-Local 21 Agreement provided an “equity adjustment” of an additional 3 percent to both the City’s Architect classification and its Civil Engineer classification. Accordingly, the Agency classifications tied to these City positions will receive a comparable salary increase. No other Agency position, however, is tied to a City classification that received an equity adjustment.
d) Comparability and Salary Study. In the existing MOA for the Management /Supervisory Bargaining Unit, the Agency classifications of Development Service Manager and Administrative Services Manager are linked to the City classifications of Assistant Director of Property and Senior Departmental Personnel Officer, respectively. Local 21 has questioned the appropriateness of these external benchmarks and proposed that the Agency positions should be tied to new City classifications (Manager V and Manager IV) within the City’s Management Classification and Compensation Plan (MCCP).
Under the MCCP, the City’s Department of Human Resources has replaced approximately 250 separate management classes with 18 new management levels having expanded salary ranges. The MCCP is a comprehensive regulatory scheme that the City initially adopted in 2001 to provide more flexible hiring procedures for management positions. Its primary impact has been to allow City departments to appoint new management employees at higher salaries to address recruitment or retention issues, extraordinary time-limited assignments, special skills for job performance, or internal equity considerations. Until recently, incumbent employees were not eligible for the higher salary ranges under the MCCP.
In light of the Local 21’s concerns about the existing benchmarks for Agency positions and management’s concerns about the applicability of the MCCP positions, the Agency agreed, over the next six to nine months, to “conduct a comparability and salary study of the Agency’s Development Service Manager and Administrative Services Manager classifications to determine whether the current benchmarks of City Assistant Director of Property and Senior Departmental Personnel Officer, respectively, remain valid or whether they should be changed to Manager V and Manager IV (MCCP classifications).” Section 1 of Article II of Memorandum of Agreement (2004-2006) (Management/Supervisory Unit). At the conclusion of the study, the Union may reopen the contract for “the purpose of negotiating the benchmarks of classification comparability for Development Services Manager and Administrative Services Manager.”
2. TELECOMMUTING.
The City’s Department of Human Resources has adopted a Telecommuting Policy and Program that authorizes City department directors to allow eligible City employees to work in a designated area at home on specified work days. In a 58 page Program Guidelines and Participation Packet, the City emphasizes that both the employee and the employee’s job must meet certain eligibility requirements. The duties of the job must be independent in nature and not require the employee’s presence at the work place. The employee must demonstrate that his or her “personal characteristics . . . are well suited to telecommuting, as determined by the supervisor.” If the supervisor determines that both job and employee are eligible, the employee must enter into a telecommuting agreement specifying the days and hours that the employee will work at home, establishing workspace requirements, and ensuring the employee’s regular contact with the office. A supervisor’s denial of an employee’s application for telecommuting is not subject to grievance procedures, but may be appealed to the department head or designee.
The proposed Agency MOAs with the Local 21 Units provide that the Agency “shall implement a telecommuting program substantially based on the [City’s Telecommuting Policy and Program]” and includes references to the City’s eligibility and participation requirements, application process, and other standards. Section 5. A (3) of Article II. As with the City program, the Agency’s program is not subject to grievance procedures.
CONCLUSION
The new provisions in the Agency contracts with the Local 21 Units are the product of extensive negotiations and are comparable to those in the City contract for employees represented by Local 21. Accordingly, the staff recommends approval of the three Agency Memoranda of Agreement with the Local 21 Units.
Originated by Jim Morales, General Counsel
Marcia Rosen
Executive Director
RESOLUTION NO. 131-2006
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL (IFPTE) LOCAL 21 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS UNIT FOR THE PERIOD OF
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), Local 21, represents three bargaining units at the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco (“Agency”): the Architects and Engineers Unit, Professional/Technical Unit and Management/ Supervisory Unit. Each bargaining unit has its own agreement with the Agency.
- By Resolution No. 110-2004, dated September 21, 2004, the Agency authorized the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with IFPTE Local 21 Architects and Engineers (“Union”). This MOA expired on June 30, 2006, but the Agency and Union (“Parties”) agreed to abide by its terms pending the negotiation of a new agreement.
- The City and County of San Francisco (“City”) recently concluded labor negotiations with its employees who are represented by Local 21: Agreement Between and for the City and County of San Francisco and The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO for Fiscal Years 2006-2007, 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 (“City-Local 21 Agreement”).
- The Parties relied on the City-Local 21 Agreement in negotiating a new contract for Agency employees.
- The Parties have negotiated a new MOA to cover the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. The MOA includes the following new provisions: salary increases that match increases for City employees represented by Local 21; an expanded salary range for Agency employees meeting special criteria that match the City-Local 21 Agreement; equity adjustments in salary for the Agency’s Architect and Civil Engineer classifications because they are tied to City classifications receiving the same adjustment; and a telecommuting provision that matches the City-Local 21 Agreement. In other respects, the new MOA does not change the terms of the previous agreement.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Memorandum Agreement with IFPTE Local 21 Architects and Engineers Unit, for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
RESOLUTION NO. 132-2006
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL
AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS (IFPTE) LOCAL 21
PROFESSIONAL/ TECHNICAL UNIT FOR THE PERIOD OF
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), Local 21, represents three bargaining units at the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco (“Agency”): the Architects and Engineers Unit, Professional/Technical Unit and Management/ Supervisory Unit. Each bargaining unit has its own agreement with the Agency.
- By Resolution No. 111-2004, dated September 21, 2004, the Agency authorized the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with the IFPTE Local 21 Professional/Technical Unit (“Union”). This MOA expired on June 30, 2006, but the Agency and Union (“Parties”) agreed to abide by its terms pending the negotiation of a new contract.
- The City and County of San Francisco (“City”) recently concluded labor negotiations with its employees who are represented by Local 21: Agreement Between and for the City and County of San Francisco and The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO for Fiscal Years 2006-2007, 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 (“City-Local 21 Agreement”).
- The Parties relied on the City-Local 21 Agreement in negotiating a new contract for Agency employees.
- The Parties have negotiated a new MOA to cover the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. The MOA includes the following new provisions: salary increases that match increases for City employees represented by Local 21; an expanded salary range for Agency employees meeting special criteria that match the City-Local 21 Agreement; and a telecommuting provision that matches the City-Local 21 Agreement. In other respects, the new MOA does not change the terms of the previous agreement.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the IFPTE Local 21 Professional/Technical Unit, for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
RESOLUTION NO. 133-2006
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL
AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS (IFPTE) LOCAL 21
MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY UNIT FOR THE PERIOD OF
OCTOBER 1, 2006 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009
BASIS FOR RESOLUTION
- The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), Local 21, represents three bargaining units at the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco (“Agency”): the Architects and Engineers Unit, Professional/Technical Unit and Management/ Supervisory Unit. Each bargaining unit has its own agreement with the Agency.
- By Resolution No. 112-2004, dated September 21, 2004, the Agency authorized the execution of a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with IFPTE Local 21 Management/Supervisory Unit (“Union”). This MOA expired on June 30, 2006, but the Agency and Union (“Parties”) agreed to abide by its terms pending the negotiation of a new agreement.
- The City and County of San Francisco (“City”) recently concluded labor negotiations with its employees who are represented by Local 21: Agreement Between and for the City and County of San Francisco and The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO for Fiscal Years 2006-2007, 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 (“City-Local 21 Agreement”).
- The Parties relied on the City-Local 21 Agreement in negotiating a new contract for Agency employees.
- The Parties have negotiated a new MOA to cover the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. The MOA includes the following new provisions: salary increases that match increases for City employees represented by Local 21; an expanded salary range for Agency employees meeting special criteria that match the City-Local 21 Agreement; a telecommuting provision that matches the City-Local 21 Agreement; and a commitment by the Agency to review two classifications in the Management /Supervisory Unit for the purpose of determining whether their comparable City classification remains valid. In other respects, the new MOA does not change the terms of the previous agreement.
RESOLUTION
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco that the Executive Director is authorized to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the IFPTE Local 21 Management/Supervisory Unit, for the period of October 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009, substantially in the form lodged with the Agency General Counsel.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
James B. Morales
Agency General Counsel
[1] The Agreement Between and for the City and County of San Francisco and The International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO for Fiscal Years 2006-2007, 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 (“City-Local 21 Agreement”) is available online at www.sfgov.org/site/dhr.
[2] Some of the Agency classifications in the Management/Supervisory Bargaining Unit are tied to City classifications that Local 21 does not represent. Those City classifications are represented by the Municipal Executives Association (MEA), whose members will receive a slightly lower salary increase than those employees represented by Local 21. Under the MEA contract, employees will receive a 2 percent increase on December 30, 2006, a 2 percent increase on June 28, 2008, and a 3% increase on December 27, 2008. Given that Local 21 – not MEA represents the Agency management/supervisory employees and management’s interest in maintaining internal equity within the entire range of Agency salaries, the proposed agreements use the Local 21 salary increases for the management/supervisory unit.
[3] Only members of the Management/Supervisory Unit are eligible for Performance Incentive Pay. The Agency Commission first adopted this program in the first Agency contract for managers and supervisors in 2000. The essential terms of the Agency’s program have not changed since its inception, although the City program on which it was based has undergone extensive revision. Currently, the Performance Incentive Program for members of the City’s Municipal Executive Association provides an automatic lump sum payment of 1.5 percent of an employee’s base salary if he or she has not received an unsatisfactory performance review. Under the Agency program, employees receive incremental increases (or a decrease) in salary based on performance review. An employee with an evaluation of “needs improvement” receives a salary reduction of 1 percent; an evaluation of “competent” receives no increase or decrease; an evaluation of “exceeds standards” establishes eligibility for a 1 percent increase; “superior” is eligible for 2 percent; and “outstanding” is eligible for a 3 percent increase. Unlike the MEA program, the Agency also has a cap on the total amount of funds available for incentive pay. This cap is 2 percent of the Management/Supervisory annual payroll, which may result in lower payments to eligible employees.